
In the U.S., stalking is generally a felony, particularly when it involves interstate travel or electronic communication. Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 2261A) outlines the elements of federal stalking, which include actions like crossing state lines with the intent to harass, intimidate, or place someone under surveillance, and engaging in conduct that causes the victim to fear for their safety or suffer emotional distress.
SOURCE – Department of Justice

The Noise Control Act of 1972 establishes a national policy to promote an environment for all Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their health and welfare. SOURCE
Quiet Communities Act of 1978 – This act established a nationwide program to support local governments in their efforts to control noise. SOURCE

4th Amendment – Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: The Fourth Amendment protects areas where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy, including their homes and the surrounding curtilage (the area immediately surrounding the home). The concept of curtilage is important in determining the extent of Fourth Amendment protection. It includes areas like porches, patios, and yards that are closely associated with the home and where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy. SOURCE

Executive Order On Enhancing Safeguards For United States Signals Intelligence Activities – aims to bolster privacy and civil liberties protections for individuals impacted by U.S. signals intelligence operations. It establishes a redress mechanism for individuals in designated “qualifying states” to challenge alleged violations of U.S. law related to their personal data collected through signals intelligence.
SOURCE

OREGON – DID NOT established the Task Force on Electromagnetic Weapons to study the usage of electromagnetic weapons in this state and identify gaps in Oregon law that need to be revised to address such usage.

MICHIGAN Compiled Laws Section 750.224a, part of Act 328 of 1931 (the Michigan Penal Code), addresses the legality of devices that emit electrical currents, impulses, waves, or beams designed to incapacitate, injure, or kill. SOURCE

MAINE — Public law 264, H.P. 868 — L.D. 1271 criminalizes the knowing, intentional, and/or reckless use of an electronic weapon on another person, defining an electronic weapon as a portable device or weapon emitting an electrical current, impulse, beam, or wave with disabling effects on a human being. SOURCE

MASSACHUSETTS — Chapter 170 of the Acts of 2004, Section 140 of the General Laws, section 131J states: “No person shall possess a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate temporarily, injure or kill, except … Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the house of correction for not less than 6 months nor more than 2 1/2 years, or by both such fine and imprisonment.” SOURCE

NEURO RIGHTS – General definition – Neurorights also known as brain rights, are a set of proposed legal principles focused on protecting individuals from the potential misuse of neurotechnology. These rights aim to safeguard mental privacy, personal identity & free will.
The following have enacted or in process of legislating Neuro Rights Laws.
United States of America
Three following 3 states enacted Neuro Rights into law.
- California, 2. Colorado 3. Montana
The list of states below are actively considering Neuro Rights Laws.
- New Jersey
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island, (2)
- South Carolina
- Tennessee
- Texas – Data broker
- Utah
- Vermont / (2), (3)
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virgina, (2)
- Wisconsin
INTERNATIONAL NEURO RIGHTS
